Subscribe via RSS

This is Hendron’s Digest: on educational technology.

Archive for the 'QuickPost' Category

Region 1

Friday, May 7th, 2010

My own personal welcome goes out to the Region 1 Superintendent’s Study Group on 21st Century Skills. Their May meeting is being hosted in Goochland (today), on Friday, May 7, 2010.

While I’ve prepared a wiki page with a lot of links for them, I thought I’d pen a few thoughts about 21st century skills here, and why I’ve bought into them.

There is a lot of criticism that’s now come about around the terminology “21st century skills,” what they mean for education, and frankly, what good teaching is about.

I’m not in disagreement with some of the points educators and their most outspoken critics make. First, these skills are not going to “save” education any more than bandwagons of the past have been able to do so. But they are an evolutionary step away from one type of thinking towards another, and this is a small but positive step.

Teachers often look at technology and knowing that, since it’s been purchased and put into the hands of students, it ought to be used…? well, yes, someone, somewhere in your school or district saw an advantage for that computer, laptop, or handheld to be there. But simply putting gadgetry in the hands of students isn’t the point at which we stop and pat ourselves on the back.

Twenty-first century skills for us have taken the emphasis away from the tools themselves. Instead, the focus in on a number of prescribed skills that are open enough to be exercised in a variety of ways, shaped by the expertise of each educator/practitioner, in one or more disciplines, towards the goal of engaging the student in a meaningful learning experience. Within the context of today’s schools, today’s budgets, and today’s state of the world, this isn’t such a bad thing.

The tools I’m showing you today have been used in schools, but I don’t want you to walk away today thinking Goochland kids all use Twitter, they all spin the globe digitally each day on each one of our Promethean boards, or that we only use open software tools. I’m sharing trends that go beyond schools, because they illustrate how I think learning will likely be transformed in the short term in our schools, if we take advantage of these new tools. Our charge, on the national, state, and district level–and in this case the regional level–is to evaluate not only the tools but the ideas behind some of these tools. We make them available, we educate teachers how these tools can be a part of their emerging educational toolkit, and how we need to prepare students to personally succeed when access to these tools becomes available. In short, the job is taking the tools, adapting them, and showing folks–when it clicks–that these tools we’ve found are the best at promoting twenty-first century skills. (If they aren’t the best, then either it’s the best you  can afford; otherwise, don’t change!) The tools in 5 or 10 years won’t matter, of course. In the long term, it’s showing kids the way towards:

  • better communication and networking with others
  • working with their peers
  • using available knowledge bases to solve problems
  • understanding the issues behind being better digital citizens.

To learn more about our efforts, visit our G21 page.

What’s up? Grant writing, that’s what…

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

I thought I would just fill folks in on some projects I’ve been working on lately. Not fun yet, but there’s certainly potential.

The federal government will be spending $650M in October on “Innovation” grants, and Goochland County Schools will be involved in two of these. The first is called Scribo Digita: Innovating Instruction Across the Curriculum through Writing. This grant will be focused on professional development with a writing across the curriculum model for grades 6-11. As part of this project, we’d be using MyAccess if we get the grant.

The second grant is called JabrDigitAL (Al-jabr is the origin of the word algebra!) and is focused on increasing student achievement in mathematics. The treatment involved would include Dimension-M’s innovative math gaming software for students at GMS and GHS.

Both of these grants take a lot of work from all involved, as we are not applying alone, but in concert with a number of area school divisions, including Hanover, Henrico, Chesterfield, and Hopewell. I look forward to sharing more as the process completes and we hopefully are awarded the grants!

Learning Central Free PD Opportunities

Tuesday, April 20th, 2010

Interested in something good and something free? “The Future of Education” and Elluminate are sponsoring the following webinar opportunities this week online. Thursday at 7:30 PM, Mr. Chris O’Neal, my counterpart in Fluvanna County, will be speaking about their iPod Touch initiative.

Tuesday, April 20th

Wednesday, April 21st

Thursday, April 22nd

Friday, April 23rd

Saturday, April 24th

The Generation Gaps

Thursday, April 15th, 2010

Last evening I had the pleasure of joining other area education leaders at the University of Richmond to hear Mr. Jason Dorsey speak on the generational differences he’s seen in evidence he’s been collecting over the past 10 years. Jason has written 5 books, but he looks young; he’s among the generation he’s labeled “Gen Y,” which means he was born between the late 1970s and 1995. This means we have Gen Ys in our schools, but also Gen Ys in our schools as teachers.

Mr. Dorsey spoke at length about this generation and what makes them stand out. They value time more than money, and they hate PowerPoint presentations. Yet, they like short, concise communication that sums up the point in bullets.

Mr. Dorsey shared with us that generational differences are defined by many factors, including parenting trends, technology, economics, and pivotal events (political corruption, 9/11, natural disasters).

Dorsey also talked about my generation, “Gen X,” and the big generation before that, the “Baby Boomers.” Boomers are competitive and have the strongest work ethic… which for them means time. Dedication to a boomer means long hours. Gen Ys are willing to work for a challenge, but may do so outside of the frame of a normal work day. They take work into their homes and anywhere else they may have an inspiring idea. They aren’t necessarily tech savvy, they’re technology dependent.

The most important things Gen Ys value are lifestyle and relationships. The differences between the generations may cause friction or frustration, but each generation has real, positive things to add to the multi-generational workforce. Today in the U.S., four different generations can be found in many organizations. As it turns out, Gen Y gets along best with the mature generation.

Dorsey shared statistics of the makeup of generations in Chesterfield County Schools, where he had spent the earlier part of the day. Among the teachers, administrators, and other certified staff:

  • 16% are Gen Y
  • 27% are Gen X
  • 54% are boomers
  • 3% make up the mature generation

Gen Ys want instant gratification… The mature generation are satisfied with delayed gratification. And the most generational conflicts take place between Gens X and Y.

Dorsey was an engaging speaker who someday might find success as a comedian. He kept us well engaged by simply speaking (no slides). My thanks go to the Region 1 Superintendents’ Group for sponsoring this event, and Chesterfield County Schools for sharing Mr. Dorsey with us.

Can I show a video to my class?

Friday, April 2nd, 2010

Ethics 101. I get this question a lot from teachers, and it’s something we cover in an ethics class I lead online each year.

Can I show a video I own (or rented) to my class? Is that legal?

DVDs (and formerly VHS tapes) are easy to come by. For a relatively cheap cost, you can have a feature film or documentary in your hands, and some contain great instructional value. There’s a few things educators need to know.

1. Long presentations of video, like showing a movie, can be less effective than showing shorter clips of video. The purpose behind the video presentation is not entertainment, but hopefully critical thinking. By showing short, focused clips, we can prepare students for what to see, and then later discuss what was seen.
2. The prices set on DVDs and videos are set with several assumptions. They are “licensed” for in-home, private viewing. Because the content on DVDs is protected by copyright, owned by the studio who produced the film, they can set the parameters for how that content is used. Whether or not we like it, the cost they have accepted for each unit is based on the assumption that the audience is at most a household.
3. Public performance is one of the 5 copy rights. Many DVDs are available with education licensing attached, at a higher cost, which accommodates a wider audience. Instead of a family of 4, the assumption is that over 100 students may view the content at a given time. When available, our media centers only buy video materials with educational licensing.

Therefore, personal DVDs you have purchased for in-home use, or rented for the same scenario, are not acceptable for viewing in the classroom. You may instead look for copies that are digitized online for promotion, or contact your media specialist about obtaining the show/movie in question that includes educational-use rights.

For more information, consult this resource.