I went to college and later, in graduate school, earned an education degree. I hadn’t throughly thought about the art and science of teaching until that later experience.
Then I realized so many of the professors I had were poor teachers. Scholars, yes. But many of them were bad teachers. Yet, I survived. I passed. I graduated. I still learned.
Someone asked, I think, “Where do you learn about teaching in professor’s school?” One professor admitted to a one semester class on teaching and learning styles experience. He told us most “never get that.”
So, you go to school, and emulate those who teach you. Yet, while the system works, does anyone ever pick up on anything on how to really engage learners, to help them meet objectives? Measurable outcomes?
I bring all of this up because I have a professor in the family. He recently got done teaching an intensive 6-week course. And while we had talked about the class, I never know much of the particulars.
It came out in the review that many students complained about the PowerPoints he’d post online before class.
“They won’t let us print those 125-slide Power Points in the office, and the university library is closed by the time we get off work… so many times, I couldn’t print the PPTs for the lecture. I just couldn’t take notes at all.”
This type of (paraphrased comment) begs us to task so many questions.
- Does the professor really give out 125 slide presentations/lecture notes?
- Are the notes required for class participation?
- Does the professor lecture for the full 3 hour class?
- Can’t students take notes on regular paper, or a laptop?
- How does the required reading fit into the course?
- What is, exactly, the best format for a 3-hour class that meets only 6-8 times?
I found out some of the answers.
Yes, the class format is 3 full hours of lecture. And another yes: the lecture notes are 120-125 slides each class. That’s a book! Plus, there is a book, with assigned readings.
I started asking questions of my professor, as if I was some learned sage, myself.
- What’s the most elemental content you want these students to walk away with?
- What’s more important–depth of one central idea, or breadth of a field?
- What do they do after they read the book? What’s the plan?
- Can you split up the course into, say, 3 chunks? Lecture/Participation/Lecture?
The details don’t matter: there’s no one right answer, and besides, I’m not giving you enough details to make any concrete suggestions. But what was surprising from this conversation was that pedagogical concerns by in large were never considered. He knew he had three hours, and what do you do? Lecture. No other options crossed his mind.
I’m wondering how many other educators, no matter their position, their station, or their level (preK through graduate school) never stop to think about… the learning experience.
As a K-12 person, I recently began searching for best-in-class blogs of other teachers, and found one by a math teacher. This educator showed such enthusiasm for his calling, it was palpable in a few areas of his writing. But in the descriptions of what took place in class, it was so un-inspiring. The descriptions of homework, classroom assignments, and reminders about what was “important” reminded me of my own math experiences. Could it be? Could math still be so uninspiring?
So many teachers emulate what they experienced as students in their role as a teacher. I’m guilty! I remember giving a quiz the first time, because, well, it “just felt like a good time for a quiz.” I’ve never stopped growing in this profession, between pedagogy, to subject matter, there’s only more to learn and more experiences to reflect upon.
I think in college most of the learning happened because I pushed myself to learn. That likely isn’t new or unfamiliar to many. If you’re reading this, and you are an educator, try putting yourself in your students’ seats every once in awhile. They are different than us, of course, separated by their own inexperience, age, likes and dislikes; but what does it feel like on the other side?
Who likes a 3 hour lecture?
Could their be alternatives?