<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: School Websites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnhendron.net/digest/2008/07/18/school-websites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnhendron.net/digest/2008/07/18/school-websites/</link>
	<description>education technology</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhendron.net/digest/2008/07/18/school-websites/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhendron.net/digest/?p=352#comment-454</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&#60;p&#62;I agree that schools and school districts are ill-equipped to make websites. What kills me is that there are so many companies eager to sell half-hearted, poor-quality web solutions to schools.&#60;/p&#62;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&#60;p&#62;I think, at this point, getting an education-targeted CMS for your school/district is probably one of the worst things a school can do, web-wise. If a teacher is not tech-saavy, they need something no more complex than a very simple blog with highly-usable archives/searching. If a teacher is tech-saavy, they can build off that blog using embedded code, or they can setup their own site.&#60;/p&#62;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&#60;p&#62;I've suffered through using one of the education CMS's for years now and I'm disgusted both that the company sells such a low quality, un-usable product and that schools so willingly buy it. Talking to my counterparts at other schools/districts, the alternatives don't seem much better. Maybe there are some OK ones that I don't know about, but we edtechs have a responsibility to aim a lot higher than the shovelware I'm seeing.&#60;/p&#62;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;p&gt;I agree that schools and school districts are ill-equipped to make websites. What kills me is that there are so many companies eager to sell half-hearted, poor-quality web solutions to schools.&lt;/p&gt;</p>
<p>&lt;p&gt;I think, at this point, getting an education-targeted CMS for your school/district is probably one of the worst things a school can do, web-wise. If a teacher is not tech-saavy, they need something no more complex than a very simple blog with highly-usable archives/searching. If a teacher is tech-saavy, they can build off that blog using embedded code, or they can setup their own site.&lt;/p&gt;</p>
<p>&lt;p&gt;I&#8217;ve suffered through using one of the education CMS&#8217;s for years now and I&#8217;m disgusted both that the company sells such a low quality, un-usable product and that schools so willingly buy it. Talking to my counterparts at other schools/districts, the alternatives don&#8217;t seem much better. Maybe there are some OK ones that I don&#8217;t know about, but we edtechs have a responsibility to aim a lot higher than the shovelware I&#8217;m seeing.&lt;/p&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.803 seconds -->
