<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On E-mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnhendron.net/digest/2007/07/28/on-e-mail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnhendron.net/digest/2007/07/28/on-e-mail/</link>
	<description>education technology</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will Schwalbe</title>
		<link>http://www.johnhendron.net/digest/2007/07/28/on-e-mail/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Schwalbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 03:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnhendron.net/digest/2007/07/28/on-e-mail/#comment-135</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the post!
It's funny about email vs e-mail. When we started writing the book, we used e-mail which is New York Times style. But we showed an early draft to Naomi Baron, a linguistics professor who has written some great stuff on electronic communication, and she told us that younger people almost never use the hyphenated form and that it was really a relic of the early days. I've had a "Google alert" on for both forms, and I must say that I am finding the unhyphenated much more common. So I think I'm glad we chose it.  But the NYT still goes for the hyphen as do a lot of other folk. I can easily see it argued either way.
Best,
Will Schwalbe, co-auhtor of SEND&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post!<br />
It&#8217;s funny about email vs e-mail. When we started writing the book, we used e-mail which is New York Times style. But we showed an early draft to Naomi Baron, a linguistics professor who has written some great stuff on electronic communication, and she told us that younger people almost never use the hyphenated form and that it was really a relic of the early days. I&#8217;ve had a &#8220;Google alert&#8221; on for both forms, and I must say that I am finding the unhyphenated much more common. So I think I&#8217;m glad we chose it.  But the NYT still goes for the hyphen as do a lot of other folk. I can easily see it argued either way.<br />
Best,<br />
Will Schwalbe, co-auhtor of SEND</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.856 seconds -->
